Choosing a backup drive – CCC Knowledge Base

When you're looking for a new backup device, we recommend purchasing a device that has twice the capacity of your source device(s). This allows for a modest amount of data growth and room for backup history (i.e. snapshots).

Specific storage device recommendations

Most external storage devices will work just fine for your backups, however performance and reliability vary. It would be impossible for us to curate an exhaustive list of every device, but we frequently get asked for a recommendation, so here's a list of some storage devices that we have tested with good results. Performance and price go hand-in-hand, we recommend that you avoid the cheapest devices.

USB and Thunderbolt Portable External SSD

These devices offer modest to ample storage and excellent performance. These are our top picks for backup devices:

Oyen Helix NVMe USB-C (250GB-2TB)
Oyen U34 Bolt Thunderbolt (4TB, 8TB) [Best performance for large media files]
Samsung T5 Portable SSD USB-C (1TB, 2TB)
Samsung T7 Portable SSD USB-C (1TB, 2TB, 4TB)†

† We do not recommend the Samsung T7 "Touch" model. The "touch" functionality uses a proprietary locking mechanism that requires Samsung drivers, and comes with a 27-34% price premium. This mechanism is not comparable to FileVault; CCC cannot automatically unlock these devices. The non-touch model provides the same functionality as far as a backup device is concerned, and can be encrypted easily with native macOS Encryption. In general, we do not recommend installing the third-party drivers or software that comes with an external storage device, we frequently see more trouble than benefit from that software.

Bare mechanical drive (SATA 3.5") 500GB - 6 TB

These drives are "bare" and will need an enclosure or dock to be used externally:

WD Black Performance Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, 256 MB Cache, 3.5"

Not Recommended

Avoid disks that use Shingled Magnetic Recording

Many years ago Seagate introduced Shingled Magnetic Recording to increase the storage capacity of rotational hard drives, but at the expense of writing performance. We anticipate considerably worse performance for APFS in particular on these devices. Many vendors have not been particularly forthright about the use of SMR in their devices until recently. Some† devices that leverage SMR include:

† This is far from an exhaustive list. None of these manufacturers documents whether the disks in their branded enclosures are using SMR. Due to this lack of transparency and based on experience with these devices, we recommend that you avoid branded external storage enclosures from Seagate, Western Digital and Toshiba. Please bear in mind that this recommendation is specific to the branded enclosures. Many Western Digital bare hard drives, for example, have excellent specs and we recommend them above.

Avoid 5400RPM Rotational HDDs, aka "Slim", "Portable" or 2.5" hard drives

These disks are cheap and can be acquired by the pallet at your local consumer warehouse. Unfortunately, these disks are really slow! Here are a few examples of these slower devices:

Seagate Backup Plus Slim Portable Drive
Seagate Ultra Portable Drive
Western Digital My Passport Ultra Portable
Western Digital easystore
Western Digital Elements
LaCie Mobile Drive
G-Technology G-DRIVE Mobile USB 3.0 Portable External Hard Drive

These devices can be acceptable for use as a backup disk if you already own one, but you should expect poorer performance from these cheaper devices. If you're shopping for a new backup disk, we recommend that you avoid these disks altogether.

USB "Thumb" drives and SD cards:

Despite being based on flash storage, which you'd think would be faster than rotational storage, USB thumb drives and SD cards are often quite slow. We don't recommend using these devices for backing up any substantive amount of data, these are usually only useful for ad hoc file sharing between computers. Flash-based memory like that used in SD cards and thumb drives also has limited write/erase cycles that are much lower than that of a traditional SSD or mechanical hard drive making them not appropriate as a primary backup device.

Sandisk Extreme SSDs

Many incidents of data loss have been reported for these devices.

Backing up to Network Attached Storage (NAS)

The convenience of a wireless backup to a NAS device is appealing. Based on user feedback, however, we discourage people from relying on NAS devices for their primary backup for several reasons:

Write performance to a NAS device is typically, at best, comparable to writing to a USB 2.0 HDD
Performance of a NAS accessed via WiFi can be 10-100 times slower than the average locally-attached hard drive.
Periodically validating the integrity of data on a NAS device may be impractical due to network performance.
WiFi backups are only as reliable as the network connection and macOS's network filesystem client.
Filesystem transactions on a network filesystem incur a lot more overhead than filesystem transactions on a locally-attached filesystem, leading to very long backup windows when your data set has lots of files (e.g. > 250K files).

For primary backups, we recommend that you procure a USB or Thunderbolt hard drive and create a backup on that locally-attached disk.

NAS devices that we specifically do not recommend

Western Digital MyCloud Home: The "Home" model of this NAS device requires the use of WD-proprietary software to access the storage securely; direct access to the storage via SMB is only available with Guest privileges. Users report that performance of the storage while using WD's software is subpar in comparison to Guest access via SMB, and other users have reported to us that macOS is unable to create or mount disk images on the storage when mounted via Western Digital's software.